Run a search gap analysis in 30 minutes.
Identify every keyword your top three competitors rank for that you don't. The exact workflow, the tools, and the template to ship the deliverable by end of day.
- ▸Most search gap analyses fail because they produce a 2,000-row spreadsheet nobody reads.
- ▸The useful output is 10–20 keywords ranked by business value + ease of capture. Not the full list.
- ▸30 minutes is plenty of time if you use the right tool and filter aggressively.
- ▸The biggest wins are usually category keywords where competitors have a slightly-better page than you.
Identify the three competitors.
The selection of which competitors to analyze matters more than the analysis itself. Pick the three most obviously comparable to your product. If you include aspirational-but-different brands (Salesforce if you're a 10-person SaaS) you'll drown in irrelevant terms.
- ▸Pick three direct competitors. Not aspirational — direct.
- ▸Same business model (SaaS vs service, subscription vs one-time).
- ▸Similar funding stage (seed, Series A, B, etc.).
- ▸If you can't decide: the three names that come up most in sales calls.
Pull the keyword overlap.
Use Ahrefs, SEMrush, or a dedicated gap tool to export keywords where your competitors rank top 10 and you rank 20+ (or not at all). Filter by volume (>100/mo is a reasonable floor), keyword difficulty (<40), and language/country (match your ICP).
- ▸Export: top 10 competitor vs your rank 20+ or none.
- ▸Filter: volume >100/mo, difficulty <40, target language/country.
- ▸Expect: 500–2,000 keywords in a typical export.
Score and rank.
Now the actual value: rank each keyword by business value + ease of capture. Business value is commercial intent (a 'pricing' keyword beats a 'what is' keyword). Ease of capture is inversely proportional to keyword difficulty. Score both on 1–5; multiply for priority.
- ▸Business value: commercial intent (1–5). Does this keyword convert?
- ▸Ease of capture: 5 minus (KD / 20). Lower difficulty = higher score.
- ▸Priority = business value × ease of capture.
- ▸Keep only the top 10–20. Discard the rest.
The 10–20 number matters. Anything more and your team won't act; anything fewer and you'll miss the easy wins. Force the list to fit on one screen.
Ship the deliverable.
The output of the analysis isn't a spreadsheet — it's a one-page doc with the 10–20 prioritized keywords, a recommended content structure for each, and a rough effort estimate. Send it to the content team with a 'pick the top 3' note.
- ▸One-page doc, not a spreadsheet.
- ▸Each keyword: target page URL (or 'create new'), rough content structure, effort estimate.
- ▸Call out the top 3 as a starting sprint.
- ▸Share with content team + growth lead. Done.
Related for your role
ALL RESOURCES →Stack Consolidation ROI Calculator
Enter what you pay Optimizely, Crayon, Hotjar, and Ahrefs today. See what Optimize Pilot would cost instead — and how many headcount the delta covers.
2026 State of Growth Stacks
We surveyed 340 growth and CRO leaders at Series A–C companies. The average stack costs $5,142/mo and nobody can name what it's testing this week.
Free SaaS Growth Stack Audit
A founder records a 20-minute Loom reviewing your current tool stack with concrete consolidation recommendations. No pitch — just the numbers.
Stop re-running this every quarter.
The SEO Suite inside Optimize Pilot runs competitor gap analysis continuously — not quarterly. New keywords appear in your dashboard within 24 hours of a competitor ranking for them.